There may be times when it is desirable to mount flexible marine solar panels on a canvas bimini or dodger and be able to quickly and easily remove them. Our auxiliary solar panel mounting kit is designed for such an application. One of our business associates, Ed Foster, came up with a brilliant idea for a mounting system that does not require you to put holes in your beautiful bimini or dodger canvas - high power rare earth magnets. Very high power rare earth magnets (up to 20 pound pull strength per magnet) are ideal for temporary mounting of our flexible solar panels on a canvas bimini or dodger. Our rare earth magnet kit includes 8 or 12 magnets and adhesive to attach the magnets to the upper side of the solar panel. Quality magnets are triple coated with a nickel-copper-nickel or an epoxy-copper-nickel coating. These magnets are also available with a plastic or rubber coating. We are testing various designs to determine resistance to corrosion in a saltwater environment. This is the big unknown. Using the magnet mounting kit is easy. Attach magnets to each corner of the solar panel and optionally attach two near the center of larger flexible panels using the included double sided adhesive tape. Position the flexible marine solar panel on the bimini or dodger and attach a mating set of magnets on the underside of the canvas. Connect the solar panel to the solar system using an MC4 T-branch connector. Store the panel under a bunk when not in use. We tested a set of these magnets on a 110 watt flexible panel during 6 week cruise in the North Channel of Lake Huron during the summer of 2018. We were in heavy winds and the panel did not move a bit. The magnets held the panel secure and there was no air getting under the panel to lift it.
11 Comments
Custom Marine Products will be conducting three seminars at the Pacific Sail and & Power Boat Show in Richmond, CA April 20, 21 and 22. These seminars will provide an introduction to the basics of PV marine solar panel technology and how to apply this technology to design a solar system for your cruising needs. The seminars will also include a mini workshop in determining your electrical energy usage as a first step in designing a custom marine solar system. I have presented many of these seminars at various boat shows and they have been well received. No sign up is required. Just attend and enjoy.
The seminar material can be found on our website under SUPPORT, MANUALS & INFO, last item. This year we tested our new 160 Watt SunPower cell solar panel with our integrated water heating system on a 6 week cruise in Northern Lake Huron at a latitude of about 46 degrees. We used an EP Tracer BN 20 amp MPPT Controller. The 160 watt panel provided plenty of power to meet our 70 amp hour per day requirements. The 160 watt panel was mounted using our CMP pole mounting system so I could tilt and rotate the panel to achieve optimum sun angle. I set the sun angle once and rotated the panel three times a day (morning, midday, evening) and figure I got about 30% more performance over a fixed horizontally mounted panel.
Operating statistics: Our power usage averaged approximately 70 amp hours or 850 watt hours in a 24 hour period. Our current draw was from a refrigerator/freezer running 24/7, our LED lights in the evening, cell phone chargers, laptop computer several hours a day and our radios and instruments during the day. Our windlass is only run when the engine is running so we don't include it in our power consumption calculation as the alternator quickly makes up for its power usage. We have a 75 amp Balmar alternator with a smart regulator. Our house bank consists of 3 flooded cell batteries giving us a total capacity of 330 amp hours. We started the engine to move anchorages about every three days. Results and findings: 1. Our battery bank was fully charged by 1 PM most sunny or mostly sunny days when at anchor. This is in contrast to 2 PM in last year using our 120 watt panel on a pole. 2. The EP Tracer BN MPPT controller with the remote display proved to be an outstanding piece of equipment. It was simple to program, easy to read, collected the appropriate data and was very efficient. It was exciting (I get excited about these things) to see 9+ amps being poured into the battery bank in the morning. It would be frustrating to see it only outputting and amp or two in the afternoon in full sun but then you realize it is doing its job. It fully charged the batteries in the morning and was in float mode topping off the battery bank in the afternoon. 3. Rotating the panel during the day, especially in the morning, significantly increased the power generation of the panel. 4. The data gathered confirmed that this panel configuration supplied all the power we needed and has excess capacity to catch up on battery charge from a string of cloudy days. 65. The panel was affected by shading as would be expected. Occasionally the panel was shaded by the back stay or the mast. While the shading was minimal, it degraded the performance by up to 40%. Data: At anchor Motor Sunny to Cloudy to Mostly Sunny Mostly Cloudy Average watt hrs per day 1,047 645 700 220 Average amp hours per day 55 40 60 40 Maximum watt output in 24 hours 1,210 770 1,210 770 Maximum amp hours in 24 hours 100 64 100 64 Observations: 1. The minimum watt hour output doesn't mean much because it is dependent on both the cloud cover and the state of charge of the bank as a result of alternator charging, 2. The maximum watt hours per day of 1,210 is not the maximum output capacity of the system in a 24 hour period because the batteries were charged by 1 PM so the controller shut down the charge from the panel. A higher drain on the house battery bank would have resulted in this number being higher. 3. Average amp hours per day is computed by dividing the watt hours by 12 volts. This is a ballpark calculation. 4. This configuration proved to have plenty of capacity for our cruising needs even without using an auxiliary flexible solar panel we store under a bunk. We did not use shore power to charge our battery bank for the entire summer. Solar Water Heater: We installed our new solar water heating system. It consists of a heat collector or heat exchanger mounted on the back of the solar panel, and a circulating pump. See our earlier blog for design considerations. The pump circulates water from the water heater through the heat exchanger on the panel. We used the same configuration on our 120 watt panel last year. Results: On sunny days at anchor we had warm water for showers and dish washing. The water temperature in our 6 gallon hot water tank would warm from 60 degrees to about 105 degrees in 2-31-2 hours on a sunny calm day. As expected, we confirmed that strong winds tend to cool the panel and reduce the heating efficiency as do clouds. Overall, the water heating system cools the surface of the panel by at least 20 degrees. This increases the efficiency of the panel since solar panel performance degrades as they are heated by the sun. Insulating the tubing running between the heat exchanger and the water heater significantly increased the efficiency of the system. In conclusion, the radiant energy water heating system works well on sunny days with both our larger and our standard sized panels. See our product section or read our earlier blog for details. I am often asked how to best turn a marine solar system on and off and if doing so will damage the panels. Below are some thoughts:
The solar controller is powered by your batteries, not your solar panels so you don't want to disconnect the controller from the battery bank to shut down you solar system as the controller will need to reboot and reset each time it is powered up. Rather, the proper way to turn off or shut down your solar system is by opening the positive wire from your solar array to your controller. We suggest a simple on/off switch in the positive wire from the solar array to the controller. Turning the solar array on and off with this switch will do no damage to the solar system. There is a reason it is desirable to be able to shut down the solar system with the switch or breaker between the solar panel and the controller. When charging off the alternator, you want maximum output going to the battery bank for bulk charging until the batteries are up to proper voltage. Some alternators, especially alternators with smart regulators sense the state of charge of the battery bank and determine to apply either a bulk or a float charge. If the panels are connected and producing, the regulator of the alternator will see the sum of the battery charge plus the solar charge coming from the panels. This apparent heightened state of charge may result in the regulator putting the alternator in float mode prematurely because it thinks the battery bank state of charge is higher than it really is. The same applies for the shore charger. This condition only occurs with certain combinations of alternator regulators, solar controllers and shore power chargers. Most of the time it is not an issue. Confused? As a general rule, to be certain of getting the maximum performance from your engine alternator and your shore charger, open the solar breaker when they are in use. Otherwise, experiment with your equipment and see if there is interference between the units as described above. If not, leave the solar system on all the time; that is what we do. May 2017 Bruce Canavan Mariner 31 ketch - Letter to Good Old Boat Magazine I had been planning to add solar panels to my Mariner 31 ketch for some time but was having trouble finding a location that would work until I saw a dockmates side cockpit setup and decided right then to pull the trigger and get some ordered.
I got on Tom‘s website (custommarineproducts.com) and was amazed at the wealth of background and technical information available. He even has spreadsheets that will allow you to easily calculate the electrical loads for both stationary and underway situations, including various losses and reductions. Using this new found knowledge (a little being a dangerous thing) I ordered two 120 watt panels & a 20 amp MPPT controller with monitor. A couple of days later I got an email back from Tom as a follow up to discuss specifics on my planned setup. He suggested using two 10 amp controllers with separate monitors to achieve better output with the side mounts and mizzen shadow. In addition, he noted several fittings I had overlooked in the original order. He re-worked the invoice to provide the additional material with minimal additional increase in cost to me. Over the course of the next two months we maintained contact and Tom helped to resolve issues as I worked on the installation (a 13 hour round trip to San Diego where the boat is berthed slowed progress). Tom’s service is above and beyond any I have experienced. I have been recommending him with any responses I give at the dock regarding the installation. Great publication. Keep up the good work. Bruce Canavan This year we tested our new 120 Watt SunPower cell solar panel with our integrated water heating system on a 5 week cruise in Northern Lake Huron at a latitude of about 46 degrees. We used an EP 20 amp MPPT Controller. A 10 amp controller would have been sufficient but we wanted extra capacity so we could plug in an auxiliary 100 watt semi-flexible panel as a backup if we needed additional power because of a series of cloudy days. Plugging in an extra panel is simple using the MC4 connectors and an MC4 T-branch connector. We had mostly sunny days so we didn't need additional power beyond what the 120 watt panel provided. The weather was awesome! The 120 watt panel was mounted using our CMP pole mounting system so I could tilt and rotate the panel to achieve optimum sun angle. I set the sun angle once and rotated the panel three times a day (morning, midday, evening) and figure I got about 30% more performance over a fixed horizontally mounted panel. Operating statistics: Our power usage averaged approximately 70 amp hours or 850 watt hours in a 24 hour period. Our current draw was from a refrigerator/freezer running 24/7, our LED lights in the evening, cell phone chargers, laptop computer several hours a day and our radios and instruments during the day. Our windlass is only run when the engine is running so we don't include it in our power consumption calculation as the alternator quickly makes up for its power usage. We have a 75 amp Balmar alternator with a smart regulator. Our house bank consists of 3 flooded cell batteries giving us a total capacity of 330 amp hours. We started the engine to move anchorages about every three days. Results and findings: 1. Our battery bank was fully charged by 2 PM most sunny or mostly sunny days when at anchor. This is in contrast to 12-1 PM in past years using our 150 or 160 watt panels on poles. 2. The EP Tracer BN MPPT controller with the remote display proved to be an outstanding piece of equipment. It was simple to program, easy to read, collected the appropriate data and was very efficient. It was exciting (I get excited about these things) to see 8+ amps being poured into the battery bank in the morning. It would be frustrating to see it only outputting and amp or two in the afternoon in full sun but then you realize it is doing its job. It fully charged the batteries in the morning and was in float mode topping off the battery bank in the afternoon. 3. Rotating the panel during the day, especially in the morning, significantly increased the power generation of the panel. 4. Our weather was so sunny and the panel performed so well we had no reason to plug in the auxiliary 100 watt flexible panel using an MC4 T-branch for extra charging power. I plugged it in one morning just to confirm the configuration would work and was easy to do. It worked well and brought the charging amps to well over 12 amps. 5. The data gathered confirmed that this panel configuration supplied all the power we needed and has excess capacity to catch up on battery charge from a string of cloudy days. 6. The panel was affected by shading as would be expected. Occasionally the panel was shaded by the back stay or the mast. While the shading was minimal, it degraded the performance by up to 40%. Data: At anchor Motor Sunny to Cloudy to Mostly Sunny Mostly Cloudy Average watt hrs per day 740 540 650 290 Average amp hours per day 57 45 50 22 Maximum watt output in 24 hours 960 630 960 540 Minimum watt output in 24 hours 200 200 420 170 Observations: 1. The minimum watt hour output doesn't mean much because it is dependent on both the cloud cover and the state of charge of the bank as a result of alternator charging, 2. The maximum watt hours per day of 960 is not the maximum output capacity of the system in a 24 hour period because the batteries were charged by 2 PM so the controller shut down the charge from the panel. A higher drain on the house battery bank would have resulted in this number being higher. 3. Average amp hours per day is computed by dividing the watt hours by 13 volts. This is a ballpark calculation. 4. This configuration proved to have plenty of capacity for our cruising needs even without using the auxiliary solar panel. We have not used shore power to charge our battery bank for the entire summer. Solar Water Heater: We installed our new solar water heating system. It consists of a heat collector or heat exchanger mounted on the back of the solar panel, and a circulating pump. See our earlier blog for design considerations. The pump circulates water from the water heater through the heat exchanger on the panel. We used the same configuration on our 150 watt panel last year. Results: On sunny days at anchor we had warm water for showers and dish washing. The water temperature in our 8 gallon hot water tank would warm from 60 degrees to about 105 degrees in 2-3 hours on a sunny calm day. This was slower than the system we tested last year on our larger panel but it was perfectly adequate to meet our needs. As expected, we confirmed that strong winds tend to cool the panel and reduce the heating efficiency as do clouds. Overall, the water heating system cools the surface of the panel by at least 20 degrees. This increases the efficiency of the panel since solar panel performance degrades as they are heated by the sun. Insulating the tubing running between the heat exchanger and the water heater significantly increased the efficiency of the system. In conclusion, the radiant energy water heating system works well on sunny days with both our larger and our standard sized panels. See our product section or read our earlier blog for details. We have been testing our 150 and 160 watt solar panels for the past few years on extended cruises. While at anchor, on a sunny day, our battery banks are usually topped off by about 1 PM. We run our refrigerator/freezer 24/7. So why not use a smaller 100 or 120 watt solar panel and plug in a flexible panel on the rare occasion we need more charging power? This is what we will be testing while cruising this summer. It's a simple arrangement. We will carry a 100 watt flexible solar panel under a bunk cushion. If we need extra charging power we will simply plug it in using a T-branch connector at our pole mounted 120 watt panel and secure the flexible panel to the bimini top. That gives us 220 watts of power through our 20 amp MPPT controller. Several of our customers have reported using this configuration and are very satisfied with it. I'll report our results at the end of the season. Now, gotta go sailing and start testing.
This was the second year we used the 160 Watt solar panel on a 35 day cruise in the North Channel area of Northern Lake Huron. The boat equipment and cruising pattern was essentially the same as last year (See prior blog entries). The solar panel performance was comparable to last year with a few minor exceptions. The data comparing the performance of the 160 Watt panel during 2013 and 2014 and the 140 Watt panel in 2012 is displayed below.
Average amp hours per day produced under various conditions: 140 Watt, poly 160 Watt, mono 160 Watt, mono 2012 2013 2014 Overall average output per day 53 amp hours 48 amp hours 48 amp hours Sunny days 69 71 69 Mostly sunny days 50 50 56 Mostly cloudy days 35 37 39 Cloudy days 32 28 20 Avg. Output on days at anchor 62 61 51 Avg. Output when engine was used 43 44 45 (We had more cloudy days at anchor this year) Min amp hrs for a day 27 28 4 Max amp hrs for a day 74 77 76 Max amps output 10.5 amps 11.5 amps 11.4 amps This data is intended to provide a general idea of what to expect from the marine solar panels under various conditions. The two primary variables are the amount of sunshine and the running of the engine (the alternator charges the batteries so the controller shuts the panels down). The test boat was running a freezer/refrigerator drawing 5 amps running 6 hours a day, LED lighting, laptop computer drawing 4 amps running 3 hours a day, radios drawing 3 amps running 8 hours a day, and instruments and autopilot when under sail and power. When at anchor on a sunny to mostly sunny day our batteries were at full charge by 2 PM so we usually had excess power. When our supplier told me they had a new high output marine solar panel that was flexible I was skeptical. The specifications seemed just to good to be true. So I ordered some to test. Well, I was pleasantly surprised. These panels are very well constructed and they have a power generation comparable to our hard panels. These panels can be flexed to 30 degrees so can conform to most boat curved surfaces. The 100+ watt panels have an electrical box on the front (not shown in the picture) which contains two blocking diodes. The 50 watt panel has one blocking diode. The base material is very sturdy and strong. Each panel has grommets for attaching the panel. I have tested the output of these panels under various weather conditions and their susceptibility to shading. Below is a quick comparison of output of our three mid-range panels laying flat at mid day on a mostly sunny day measured with a meter: Flexible 100 watt Rigid 105 watt Rigid 100 watt Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Polycrystalline Short Circuit Current (Isc) 5.48 amps 5.50 amps 5.26 amps Open Circuit Voltage (Voc) 19.2 volts 19.7 volts 20.5 volts Computed Power (not rated power) 105 watts 108 watts 108 watts Additional information is available on our solar panel page. We haven't been just sitting around waiting to the water to soften up here in the Midwest. We've been working on enhancing our products and finding the latest and greatest technology.
Our 90 watt solar panel had been such a popular high performer that we went back to our supplier to see if they could provide us with a higher wattage panel for our top-of-pole mounting system. We specified a solar panel that was Class A-9 quality polycrystalline with an efficiency of 16.5% efficiency or higher, sealed and robust for the rigors of marine use, a nearly square shape for our top-of-pole application, and at a cost our customers could afford. They met our request and came up with a 140 watt polycrystalline high performance panel that measures roughly 39 X 39.5 inches and uses the same design and construction technology as our 90 watt panel. We have them on order with an expected delivery date of early May. We anticipate that the 140 watt panel will perform about as well as our popular 130 watt monocrystalline panel in full sun and outperform our 130 on a cloudy day or when partially shaded. This will make the panel ideal for northern climates where those sunny days just don't happen every day. We plan on publishing a complete analysis by mid to late June. Also stay tuned for our introduction of several new LED lights. The Kyocera KC85T is a solar panel we have recommended for pole mounting on boats with moderate power requirements. It has been very popular with our customers. Unfortunately, Kyocera no longer manufacturers this panel. To serve our customers, we are having a similar panel manufactured to our specification. This panel is the same dimensions as the KC85T, is rated at 90 watts, and is a polycrystalline Class A marine grade solar panel. This panel has a 10 year manufacturer warranty and a 10 year warranty from CMP. Out tests indicate that this panel is an excellent performer. It is now in stock and can be ordered through our web site with or without our custom top-of-pole mounting system.
I recently mounted the 90 watt panel on my boat in the Great Lakes to see how it compared to ym KC85T. The results were impressive. The 90 watt panel produced 5.5 to 6 watts consistently on sunny days (rare this Spring) and achieved a max output of 7.3 amps. It will easily produce 35 amp hours a day. We also now offer a 130 watt solar panel which has the same dimensions as our 120 watt panel. It is ideal for pole mounting because it only weighs 24 pounds and is shorter and wider than standard panels of similar power. If you have a need for smaller panels on your boat, check out Atom Voyages. James offers a top-of-pole mounting system that is ideal for panels in the 50 to 65 watt range. The amount of power needed while cruising depends on many factors including the energy used by appliances and lighting, the output of the engine alternator, the climate and the length of time away from shore power. These and other factors will determine the amount of solar power and thus size of the solar panel(s) you may need. Working with Ed Foster of foster-wills.com, we have developed a worksheet to assist you in inventorying your on board power generation and consumption and estimating you solar power requirement. Print out our Solar Power Calculation Worksheet and use it as a guide to figuring out your power generation requirement. From this you can get an idea of what your solar panel options might be. Hope it helps!
Shopping around for the right combination of solar panel, charging controller, wire and mounting system can be an onerous task. I guess that is why we have been asked so many times to offer a one stop shop complete solution. There are so many good panels on the market and prices are coming down. After considerable research, we have selected a charge controller and marine solar panel we think will meet the needs of many cruising sailors. This is a 120 or 130 watt solar panel that has excellent performance and a good profile for a top-of-pole mount. We now offer a standard top-of-pole mounting system for both this panel and the Kyocera KC85TS 85 watt panel. This is in addition to our top-of-pole mounting systems that can be easily modified to accommodate most solar panels. We like the dual battery bank controller because most cruising boats have two battery banks and it can get complicated switching the panel output from one bank to the other. This controller takes care of that by charging both banks simultaneously monitoring which bank needs most of the charge.
|
Categories
All
AuthorThomas Trimmer has been cruising with his Ericson 38 sailboat on the Great Lakes for over 20 years. He has pioneered the use of solar energy for wilderness cruising. He is continually designing and building equipment to simplify and enhance the cruising experience. Archives
July 2024
|