We tested our new 150 watt polycrystalline solar panel on a 35 day cruise in the North Channel area of Northern Lake Huron.  This panel was equipped with the prototype of our solar water heating system which will be addressed in another blog entry. The solar panel was mounted on our pole mounting system and was rotated toward the sun The boat equipment and cruising pattern was essentially the same as last year (See prior blog entries).  We were powering a freezer/refrigeration system, instruments, laptop computer, radios, autopilot, windlass and LED lights. Data was gathered using the remote display on our EP 10 amp dual output solar controller.  The solar panel performance met our expectations.  Our house battery bank consists of three 120 amp hour flooded batteries.  
Both battery banks were usually fully charged by 2 PM when at anchor and on mostly sunny days so we often had excess power. 

Data comparing the performance of the 150 watt solar panel with our 140 and 160 watt panels is presented below.

Average amp hours per day produced under various conditions:

                                                       150 Watt poly  140 Watt, poly    160 Watt, mono    160 Watt, mono
                                                                2015             2012                   2013                    2014

Overall average output per day         49 amp hours    53 amp hours       48 amp hours          48 amp hours

Sunny days                                                 60                 69                        71                        69
Mostly sunny days                                       56                 50                       50                         56 
Mostly cloudy days                                      36                 35                        37                        39
Cloudy days                                                22                 32                        28                        20
                    
Avg. Output on days at anchor                     60                  62                        61                       51
Avg. Output when engine was used              42                  43                        44                       45
 
 Min amp hrs for a day                                 4                   27                        28                        4
 Max amp hrs for a day                               84                   74                        77                      76

Max amps output                                      11.8 amps      10.5 amps            11.5 amps           11.4 amps

This data is intended to provide a general idea of what to expect from the solar panels under various conditions.  The two primary variables are the amount of sunshine and the running of the engine (the alternator charges the batteries so the controller shuts off power from the panels).   Because the panel was equipped with a water heat collector on the back, it may have run hotter on sunny days when the water circulation pump wasn't run thus degrading the performance by up to 10%.The average panel output on sunny days at anchor with no motoring was 67 amp hours.

Several of our customers have recently attached their semi-flexible solar panels using nuts and bolts.  
Here is what they did:
1. Place the solar panel on the canvas and mark the grommet holes on the canvas.
2. Glue a vinyl disk about 2 inches in diameter to the underside of the canvas at points where attaching bolts will be placed.
3. Puncture a hole in the fabric through the vinyl.
4. Place a 1 inch diameter or greater plastic or stainless fender washer on a 10-24 or similar stainless bolt and pass it through the canvas.
5. Place another fender washer on the bolt on top of the canvas and secure with a nut.
At this point, you have a reinforced canvas sandwiched between two fender washers.
6. Pass the bolt through the solar panel grommet and secure with an acorn nut.
7. Repeat for each solar panel grommet.
See diagram below for details.


On the installation shown above, the solar wires were run through the channel used to attach the canvas to the frame thus hiding most of the wiring.

The excellent performance of our semi-flexible solar panels is opening up new ways to easily implement solar systems on cruising boats. There are several ways to attach our flexible solar panels to a canvas bimini top.  Here are some creative ideas our customers have implemented:
1. Zipper solar panels directly to the bimini canvas - Stitch zippers along the sides of the solar panel using an industrial sewing machine.  Stitch the mating zipper onto the bimini top with a flap to cover the zipper to protect it from UV rays.  Zip the panel onto the bimini and run the wires as necessary.  See picture to the right.

2. Attach solar panels to canvas and zipper canvas to the bimini canvas - Panels can be attached to a piece of canvas using zippers, snaps or grommets.  Sleeves can be sewn into canvas to hide and protect the wires.  The canvas with the solar panels can then be attached to the bimini canvas using zippers.
3. Attach solar panels to the bimini canvas using snaps or grommets - Our flexible solar panels come with 4 or 6 sets of grommets installed.  These grommets can be used to stitch the panels directly to the bimini canvas.  Alternatively, these grommets can be drilled out and replaced with snaps.  The mating snaps can be installed in the bimini canvas so the panels can be simply be snapped into place.
4. Attach solar panels to the bimini canvas using outdoor Velcro (hook and loop) - Stitch or glue the Velcro to the back of the panel and stitch the mating Velcro to the bimini canvas.  Panels can be easily removed for storage.

Note: Because the PV cells of the panels are black, they will absorb and radiate considerable heat.  Some customers have inserted insulation between the panel and the canvas to reduce the radiated heat.  They have used the bubble wrap encased in silver foil insulation available at most home improvement stores.  It is about 5/16" thick.

This was the second year we used the 160 Watt solar panel on a 35 day cruise in the North Channel area of Northern Lake Huron.  The boat equipment and cruising pattern was essentially the same as last year (See prior blog entries).  The solar panel performance was comparable to last year with a few minor exceptions.  The data comparing the performance of the 160 Watt panel during 2013 and 2014  and the 140 Watt panel in 2012 is displayed below.

Average amp hours per day produced under various conditions:

                                                       140 Watt, poly    160 Watt, mono    160 Watt, mono
                                                                2012                        2013                       2014

Overall average output per day        53 amp hours       48 amp hours          48 amp hours

Sunny days                                                 69                        71                         69
Mostly sunny days                                       50                       50                         56 
Mostly cloudy days                                      35                        37                        39
Cloudy days                                                 32                        28                        20
                    
Avg. Output on days at anchor                     62                        61                       51
Avg. Output when engine was used             43                        44                       45
 (We had more cloudy days at anchor this year)

 Min amp hrs for a day                                   27                        28                        4
 Max amp hrs for a day                                  74                        77                      76

Max amps output                                      10.5 amps            11.5 amps           11.4 amps

This data is intended to provide a general idea of what to expect from the marine solar panels under various conditions.  The two primary variables are the amount of sunshine and the running of the engine (the alternator charges the batteries so the controller shuts the panels down). 

The test boat was running a freezer/refrigerator drawing 5 amps running 6 hours a day, LED lighting, laptop computer drawing 4 amps running 3 hours a day, radios drawing 3 amps running 8 hours a day, and instruments and autopilot when under sail and power.  When at anchor on a sunny to mostly sunny day our batteries were at full charge by 2 PM so we usually had excess power.

Our top-of-pole solar system addresses the need for power while at anchor and under sail.  In fact, we have found the solar system usually provides us an excess of electrical power while cruising.  Now we find the only additional thing we need while at anchor for an extended period is warm water for showers and cleaning dishes.  Sure there is the old black bag absorb the sun's heat option but this is a bit cumbersome.  
Then there is the option to run the engine until it heats up the water in the water heater.  Running the engine for warm water is inefficient and undesirable. 


Now we have what promises to be a pretty good solution; solar heated water.  Because the solar panel is dark in color, it absorbs a significant amount of the sun's energy in the form of heat.  This is dissipated through the back and front of the panel by air currents.  By attaching a heat collector/exchanger to the back of the panel, properly insulating it and circulating water through the heat exchanger we are able to collect that excess heat and store it in the water heater tank or in a separate holding tank.  While still in the test stages, we have completed proof of concept and can make the heat exchangers available to DIY mariners who are interested in setting up such a system.  We plan on offering a complete water heating system retro fit kit within the next year. 

Initial tests indicate that with our 140 and 160 watt systems we can heat 3 gallons of water from 60 to 110 degrees F in less that a half hour on a sunny day with the ambient temperature of 65 degrees F.

Our top-of-pole system is about to be a 3 in 1 assembly; solar panel mount, outboard motor crane and solar water heating system.  Call us if you are interested in participating in our test program.

When our supplier told me they had a new high output marine solar panel that was flexible I was skeptical.  The specifications seemed just to good to be true.  So I ordered some to test.  Well, I was pleasantly surprised.

These panels are very well constructed and they have a power generation comparable to our hard panels.  These panels can be flexed to 30 degrees so can conform to most boat curved surfaces.  The 100+ watt panels have an electrical box on the front (not shown in the picture) which contains two blocking diodes.  The 50 watt panel has one blocking diode.  The base material is very sturdy and strong.  Each panel has grommets for attaching the panel.  

I have tested the output of these panels under various weather conditions and their susceptibility to shading.  Below is a quick comparison of output of our three mid-range panels laying flat at mid day on a mostly sunny day measured with a meter:

                                                      Flexible 100 watt         Rigid 105 watt          Rigid 100 watt
                                                      Monocrystalline           Monocrystalline        Polycrystalline

Short Circuit Current (Isc)                      5.48 amps                   5.50 amps                5.26 amps
Open Circuit Voltage (Voc)                    19.2 volts                    19.7 volts                  20.5 volts
Computed Power (not rated power)         105 watts                    108 watts                 108 watts

Additional information is available on our solar panel page.

In an earlier blog entry dated 8/10/2011 I documented the performance of our 130 watt mono-crystalline solar panel on a 22 day cruise in the upper Great Lakes.  In an August 2012 blog entry I documented the performance of our 140 watt poly-crystalline solar panel.  This year I documented the performance of our 160 watt mono-crystalline solar panel on the same boat under similar conditions.  The only variables were the weather and the running of the engine when moving from anchorage to anchorage (wind was on our nose quite often this summer).  The number of days of each cruise varied so I an presenting average performance based on four weather conditions; sunny, mostly sunny, mostly cloudy and cloudy.


Test conditions:

• The boat has two deep cycle wet cell battery banks; 315 amp hours and 105 amp hours.
• The boat has holding plate refrigeration which draws 5 amps.  The weather was generally cooler than previous years so the frig compressor ran less than usual; 6+ hours a day.  The lap top computer was used for navigation and draws 3 amps.  All lights are LEDs.
• When motoring, the panel was usually connected to the controller.
• The dual battery bank solar panel controller shuts off power from the panel when the batteries are fully charged.  i.e. After 3 or more hours of motoring.
• The Remote Display of the dual battery bank controller was used to collect all the data.
• Our mode of cruising was to anchor for 2-4 days at a time and move on to another anchorage.  We did not dock and use shore power during the cruise.
• The tilt angle of the panel was rarely changed. I was usually set at about 45 degrees.  The panel was rotated for optimum sun angle on an average of 3 times per day.
• When the battery banks are fully charged the dual output controller will shut off the panel charge to the batteries.  This is reflected in the performance of the panels.  This year our battery banks were at full charge more often than the previous two years because there was less draw from the refrigeration system due to the cooler weather.  I believe this is reflected in the performance of the 160 watt panel.

Test Results:

Definition: amp hour – amps produced or consumed in one hour

Average amp hours per day produced under various conditions:

                                                130 Watt, mono    140 Watt, poly    160 Watt, mono

Overall average output per day         54 amp hours    53 amp hours       48 amp hours
Note: 160W had only 5 sunny days, 140W had 10 sunny days and 130W had 8 sunny days

Sunny days                                    71                          69                       71
Mostly sunny days                          51                          50                       50
Mostly cloudy days                         46                          35                       37
Cloudy days                                   24                          32                        28
                    
Avg. Output on days at anchor         62                          62                        61
Avg. Output when engine was used  35                          43                        44 
 (difference partially because 130W was often disconnected often when engine was used. Not so for 140W and 160W)

 Min amp hrs for a day                    16                          27                        28

Max amps output                           10.5 amps           10.5 amps            11.5 amps

Interpreting the Results:

Each solar panel performed about as expected.  The average daily output was less for the 160 watt panel but it had half as many sunny days and comparable mostly sunny days.  The 130 watt mono panel provided a slightly higher average output on sunny days and the 140 watt poly panel provided a higher average output on cloudy days. The max output of the 160 watt panel was an amp higher that the others. My sense was that the poly-crystalline panel was less sensitive to shading from the rigging but this is difficult to document.  On sunny days, both solar panels often performed above their sticker rating of 130, 140 and 160 watts by as much as 50 watts (9.5 amps at 21 volts is 189 watts) .  I believe this is due to the high quality of silicone crystals used.

Observations:

All three solar panels generally met our power needs for the duration of the cruises.  We occasionally ran a small deficit of amp hours during an extended anchorage when cloudy but never needed to use the engine alternator to charge the battery banks except when motoring from place to place.   On days when the engine was used we often had an excess of power generation from the 75 amp alternator and the solar panel.

Choosing the right type of solar panel:

Based on the performance data, each solar panel will perform adequately under most  conditions.  The  130 watt and 160 watt mono-crystalline solar panels are an excellent choice for boats in mostly sunny areas with little possibility of shading from the rigging.  The 140 watt poly-crystalline solar panel is an excellent choice for areas with more partly cloudy and cloudy days and on boats where there is some shading from the rigging.

In an earlier blog entry dated 8/10/2011 I documented the performance of our 130 watt mono-crystalline solar panel on a 22 day cruise in the upper Great Lakes.  This year I documented the performance of our 140 watt poly-crystalline solar panel on the same boat under similar conditions.  The only variables were the weather and the running of the engine when moving from anchorage to anchorage (wind was on our nose quite often this summer).  Also this panel performance was documented over a longer period of 34 days.  

Test conditions:

• The boat has two deep cycle wet cell battery banks; 315 amp hours and 105 amp hours.
• The boat has holding plate refrigeration which draws 5 amps.  The weather was very warm so the frig compressor ran more than usual; 8+ hours a day.  The lap top computer was used for navigation and draws 3 amps.  All lights are LEDs.
• When motoring, the panel was usually connected to the controller.
• The dual bank controller shuts off power from the panel when the batteries are fully charged.  i.e. After 3 or more hours of motoring.
• The Remote Display of the dual bank controller was used to collect all the data.
• Our mode of cruising was to anchor for 2-4 days at a time and move on to another anchorage.  We did not dock and use shore power during the cruise.
• The tilt angle of the panel was rarely changed; usually about 45 degrees.  The panel was rotated for optimum sun angle on an average of 3 times per day.

Test Results:

Definition: amp hour – amps produced or consumed in one hour

Average amp hours per day produced under various conditions:

                                                  130 Watt, mono    140 Watt, poly

Overall average output per day         54 amp hours    53 amp hours

Sunny days                                    71                          69
Mostly sunny days                          51                          50
Mostly cloudy days                         46                          35
Cloudy days                                   24                          32  
                    
Output on days at anchor                62                          62
Output when engine was used         35                          43 (difference because 130W was disconnected often
                                                                                       when engine was used.  Not so this year for 140W)

 Min amp hrs for a day                    16                          27

Max amps output                           10.5 amps           10.5 amps

Interpreting the Results:

Both solar panels performed as expected.  Their average daily output was about equal.  The 130 Watt mono panel provided a slightly higher average output on sunny days and the 140 Watt poly panel provided a higher average output on cloudy days.  My sense was that the poly-crystalline panel was less sensitive to shading from the rigging but this is difficult to document.  On sunny days, both solar panels often performed above their sticker rating of 130 and 140 watts by as much as 50 watts (9.5 amps at 21 volts is 189 watts) .  I believe this is due to the high quality of silicone crystals used.

Observations:

Both the 130 watt solar panel and the 140 watt solar panel generally met our power needs for the duration of the cruises.  We occasionally ran a small deficit of amp hours during an extended anchorage when cloudy but never used the engine alternator to charge the battery banks except when motoring from place to place.   On days when the engine was used we often had an excess of power generation from the 75 amp alternator and the solar panel.

Choosing the right type of solar panel:

Based on the performance data, both solar panels will perform adequately under most  conditions.  The 130 watt mono-crystalline solar panel is an excellent choice for boats in mostly sunny areas with little possibility of shading from the rigging.  The 140 watt poly-crystalline solar panel is an excellent choice for areas with more partly cloudy and cloudy days and on boats where there is some shading from the rigging.

I mounted our new 140 watt polycrystalline solar panel and tracked its performance for four days in northern Lake Huron, Michigan.  Fortunately, I experienced different weather conditions each day so there is some data to compare the 140 watt panel to the 130 watt monocrystalline panel.  The panel was tilted at a 30 degree angle and rotated three times during the day; morning, noon and late afternoon.  The panel was partially shaded by the back stay during the late morning.  This seemed to degrade panel performance by about 1 amp. When pointed toward the sun during a clear sky period, the panel produced between 8 and 9.6 amps, considerably higher than its rated output.  The controller recorded a max output of 10.6 amps.  This is very impressive and shows the Class A silicone wafers are clearly worth the added cost over Class B wafers.  Power consumption was from refrigerator/freezer, computer, lights (LEDs) and radio.  The house battery bank was negative 28 amp hours after four days.  Had the sunny day been the last day, the battery bank would have been fully charged.   Below is the data:
          Amp Hours    Weather
Day 1     80 AH       Sunny all day
Day 2     62 AH       Hazy, partly cloudy all day
Day 3     31 AH       Cloudy, overcast, rain until 5 PM
Day 4     56 AH       Hazy, partly cloudy, no clear sky all day

Preliminary conclusions:
The 140 watt polycrystalline panel performance is comparable to our 130 watt monocrystalline panel.
The panel performed above its rated output by 1-2 amps.
Performance during cloudy and hazy periods was very good.
The 140 watt panel appeared to have less sensitive to shading than the 130 watt panel.

Relative solar panel size:  the 140 watt panel is smaller than the 130 watt panel by only 3 square inches.
The performance of our 130 watt solar panel is documented in an earlier blog entry below.

I will publish additional data as it becomes available.

We haven't been just sitting around waiting to the water to soften up here in the Midwest.  We've been working on enhancing our products and finding the latest and greatest technology.

Our 90 watt solar panel had been such a popular high performer that we went back to our supplier to see if they could provide us with a higher wattage panel for our top-of-pole mounting system.  We specified a solar panel that was Class A-9 quality polycrystalline with an efficiency of 16.5% efficiency or higher, sealed and robust for the rigors of marine use, a nearly square shape for our top-of-pole application, and at a cost our customers could afford.  They met our request and came up with a 140 watt polycrystalline high performance panel that measures roughly 39 X 39.5 inches and uses the same design and construction technology as our 90 watt panel.  We have them on order with an expected delivery date of early May. 

We anticipate that the 140 watt panel will perform about as well as our popular 130 watt monocrystalline panel in full sun and outperform our 130 on a cloudy day or when partially shaded.  This will make the panel ideal for northern climates where those sunny days just don't happen every day.  We plan on publishing a complete analysis by mid to late June.

Also stay tuned for our introduction of several new LED lights.